Kernels can be classified into the following categories:
1. Monolithic
In this type of architecture, all the basic system services like process and memory management, interrupt handling etc were packaged into a single module in kernel space.
Earlier version of this architecture had the following drawbacks:
a. The size of kernel was huge.
b. Bug fixing or addition of new features resulted in recompilation of whole kernel.
However, the modern architecture which Linux uses is much better and includes feature to dynamically load the modules thus facilitating easy extension of OS's capabilities.
Linux follows the monolithic modular approach.
2. Microkernels:
In this type of architecture, only the bare minimum is implemented in kernel space which includes managing memory protection, process scheduling and inter process communication (IPC) thus decreasing the kernel size and increasing security and stability of OS. Other basic services like device driver management,protocol stack, file systems, graphics, etc are implemented in user space and are run as servers. These servers are different from other user space programs as kernel grants them permissions to interact with physical memory which is usually off limits to most programs. Thus these serves can interact directly with the hardware. These services are started at system startup.
QNX follows the microkernel approach.
3. Hybrid Kernel:
Hybrid kernel is the most successful kernel implementation and is used in operating systems like Windows NT and above and Mac OS X. This type of kernel are extension of microkernel with some properties of monolithic kernel. Hybrid kernels are microkernel that has some non-essential code in kernel space in order for the code to run faster than it would have been in user space. Unlike monolithic kernel, they are unable to load modules at run time.
The hybrid kernel approach combines the speed and simpler design of a monolithic kernel with the modularity and execution safety of a microkernel.
1. Monolithic
In this type of architecture, all the basic system services like process and memory management, interrupt handling etc were packaged into a single module in kernel space.
Earlier version of this architecture had the following drawbacks:
a. The size of kernel was huge.
b. Bug fixing or addition of new features resulted in recompilation of whole kernel.
However, the modern architecture which Linux uses is much better and includes feature to dynamically load the modules thus facilitating easy extension of OS's capabilities.
Linux follows the monolithic modular approach.
2. Microkernels:
In this type of architecture, only the bare minimum is implemented in kernel space which includes managing memory protection, process scheduling and inter process communication (IPC) thus decreasing the kernel size and increasing security and stability of OS. Other basic services like device driver management,protocol stack, file systems, graphics, etc are implemented in user space and are run as servers. These servers are different from other user space programs as kernel grants them permissions to interact with physical memory which is usually off limits to most programs. Thus these serves can interact directly with the hardware. These services are started at system startup.
QNX follows the microkernel approach.
3. Hybrid Kernel:
Hybrid kernel is the most successful kernel implementation and is used in operating systems like Windows NT and above and Mac OS X. This type of kernel are extension of microkernel with some properties of monolithic kernel. Hybrid kernels are microkernel that has some non-essential code in kernel space in order for the code to run faster than it would have been in user space. Unlike monolithic kernel, they are unable to load modules at run time.
The hybrid kernel approach combines the speed and simpler design of a monolithic kernel with the modularity and execution safety of a microkernel.
No comments:
Post a Comment